Blog Training

Force, Work, Power, and Strength – What is the Difference?

Did you know that strength, force, and power aren’t the same thing? Most people don’t.

Of course, they absolutely should know because the difference decides how you train! There’s a difference in adaptation between punching, hauling a stone, or trying to get muscularly larger. And unless you want to be one of those people who puts in a lot of effort, just to see no progress and give up, this article will have a LOT of important things for you to know.

After reading this, you will know exactly how to train for your own goals and will never feel like you’re “confused” about exercise selection again.

Defining Force, Work, Power, and Strength

Let’s shatter preconceptions. I’ll describe each with the “physics definition” and a practical application (aka, why it matters).

What is Force?

Powerlifting is (ironically) about Work, not Power.

Physics Definition: Force is the interaction that causes an object of mass to change its velocity (Force = Mass x Acceleration). In simple terms, it’s the maximum energy you can transition into an objectIn exercise, force is determined by the max force/torque (rotational force) that a muscle can create.

Practical Application: Force is simply being able to transfer energy into something. The time it takes is negligible because the primary goal is all about the amount, not the speed. Creating force is necessary for ALL types of exercise, which is why “Force” is included in every equation below. Anyone who participates in strength training will ultimately be increasing force production.

Powerlifting is a good example of pure force production. The goal of powerlifting is not to lift a weight really quickly, but to lift at maximum capacity one time. Lifting 400lbs of weight in 3 seconds and lifting 400lbs in 1 second are the same on the scorecard. If you want to carry large things, that’s also about force production.

A counterpoint: you could train force production by pushing really hard against your house. If the house never moves, you’ve done no work, but you’ve exerted force. Not that I recommend this — you don’t build a neurological pathway for a movement pattern (will post about this on Friday), there’s no good way to quantify your efforts and track improvements, and it’s not very fun. But nonetheless, you’re producing force! So the point stands.

What is Work?

Physics Definition: Work is a function of the distance an object moves, multiplied by force (Work = Force x Distance x Cos Ɵ) .  Basically, it’s how much energy is effectively being used to move something.

Practical Application: While you focus on force production, what you really want is to produce work, because you want the object to move, too. You don’t just want to sit there with weight on your shoulders, resisting against weight if your goal is completing the lift (but you might for muscle development… more on that later). Nope, the point of most motion is to move something, not to forever exert force onto an immovable object and get nowhere.

So remember when I said Powerlifting was about force production? I told a half-truth: while most powerlifters will recognize you need to produce more force, they likely don’t think that “moving the weight” is a prerequisite. They just do it. There are ways to move more weight with less exerted force (see this insanely detailed article talking about bench press mechanics… if you dare), so I suppose a little knowledge of work and leverage mechanics can help Powerlifting goals…. but we’re getting too deep.

All you need to know is that more force production guarantees a completed exercise movement, and work means something is actually moving.

Pitching a Baseball
Think of a baseball pitch. There is “positive work” done on the ball because force is applied over a distance as it moves in his hand. PC: Rick Dikeman, CC-3.0


What is Power?

Physics Definition: Power is the rate of energy consumed in a unit of time (Power = Work/ time). In exercise, it’s the rate of performing muscular work, with potential energy becoming work (aka moving weight) or heat (aka, you getting warm). This is easier to understand if you realize that Work = Force x Distance. That is, you’re transitioning Force into something practical (work), really quickly.

Practical Application: How much energy can you squeeze into a split second? The faster you do the work, the more power you’ve produced. You’re training for power if you are lifting fast and heavy together, punching really hard, or throwing a ball very fast. Power is about being able to put a LOT of energy into something, very quickly.

An interesting idea that confounds some people: Plyometrics – stuff like jumping, explosive push-ups, running – is a form of power training! The thing is, you’re not moving an external object as much as possible, you’re moving yourself. Imagine that if a higher vertical jump is your goal, the goal is to transition energy from body into ground, then exploding upwards. Yep, that’s power training.

Olympic weightlifting is another form of power-focused training. The end goal is lifting a lot of weight, just like powerlifting, but the highly technical aspects mean it isn’t enough to produce force in a single vector. You need to produce it quickly at multiple angles if you want to complete the lift. Slowness makes the lift much harder. Check out this Olympic Weightlifting video of a Snatch. If this guy dragged his butt picking up the weight, there’s no way he could succeed. You need substantial power to get it off the ground, then above his head. The speed of work is crucial to completion of the lift.

What is Strength?

Strength is the weird term out. Strength doesn’t mean anything! In physics, strength is an ambiguous term that could refer to any number of factors, from tensile strength to shear strength. In fitness, it has no meaning either! It can refer to enduring toughness (he just ran 50 miles and swam across the ocean!), or someone’s power (that punch was strong!), or someone’s force (that guy lifted a truck! He’s strong!), or mental grit (he just dug through a concrete wall!). But physically, it has no measurable meaning.

I normally  refer to “raw strength” as a synonym for maximum force production. I say “Strength Training” instead of “Resistance Training” because it rolls off the tongue. Overall, Strength is my catch-all for any resistance-training-based activity.


A Quick Q&A on Force and Power

“Powerlifting” Isn’t About Power Then?

That’s right. Among the fitness events, “Powerlifting” is the biggest misnomer.

Powerlifting is more about maximal force (aka, lifting the MOST, not lifting the FASTEST). It would be better named “Forcelifting” or “Torquelifting”. The real “powerlifting” would be Olympic weightlifting techniques like the Snatch. You need excellent power to “explode” the weights off the ground and above your head. The best way I can describe this is, it’s about what aspects of the exercise you prioritize.

In Powerlifting: force production helps the lifts the most.
In Olympic Weightlifting, power production helps the lifts the most.

You want both to thrive.

How Does This Apply to Calisthenics and Bodyweight Training?

Calisthenics and bodyweight training are no different than weight training physically speaking.

For maximal force  — raw lifting capability — you’ll be focused on overcoming progressively heavier loads. That means you’ll train in leverage-decreased positions (like removing an arm from Pull-ups).

For maximal power — explosiveness and quick energy transition of your own body —you’ll be focused on completing a “lifting” movement as quickly as possible. So plyometric push-ups or any max-vertical jumping is power-focused.

If you want to train both, follow RoamStrong’s workout system. The method of explosive concentric movement with slow eccentric movement will give you both. Yes, you can train both at once. They are complementary of each other, and this all-aroundedness is why I made the system to begin with.

Will Training for Force or Power Produce More Muscle/Toning?

Good question. Adding muscle mass is more about resisting against heavier loads for long terms of time. So, I’d say a powerlifting focus (aka, lifting more weight) is ideal. However, adding muscle mass as your primary goal modifies your training style slightly. While you will become substantially more muscular/toned with any strength exercises, you wil see the best results when you put your body under tension. The keyword here is Time Under Tension (TUT), which is the length of time a muscle contracts while resisting force. The more force and longer your body sits under tension, the greater your TUT.

This is very well-vetted by the scientific community. Longer TUT predicted higher sarcoplasmic and hypetrophic activity (Burd 2012). Another recent study supported the the biggest contributor to post-EPOC was Time Under Tension (Scott 2012). So while increased force production and power will build muscle, adding Time Under Tension specific training helps to improve strength.


What’s an Easy Way to Remember This All?

You get better at what you do the most. If you want to carry things a lot, then practice carrying heavier and heavier things. If you want to lift really heavy things, continue to push your body to lift heavier things. If you want to lift fast & heavy, then lift things FAST on the concentric (pushing/pulling) phase of the exercise. If you want to increase muscle size, go slow on the eccentric phase of the exercise.

But also remember, any of this training supports the other functions. Training does not happen in vacuum. A quick example:

Improving your One-Armed Chin Up will improve maximum force, maximum power production (explosive concentric movement at the bottom of the bar), and place your body under tension significantly if you slow down the eccentric portion of the exercise. The easy way to get started is to follow the RoamStrong workout system to get started. As you progress, you’ll notice that ALL physical qualities get better. In the meantime, keeping training and…

Roam strong.

Become Stronger, Live Longer

Be your own hero, and transform your body and habits. Get updates whenever I post new content.

I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

Unsubscribe any time, no hard feelings.

By Aaron Roam

Aaron Roam is a fitness advocate from Berkeley, California.

12 replies on “Force, Work, Power, and Strength – What is the Difference?”

Good stuff, and well worth remembering the distinction between power, speed and strength (the “weird one” as you accurately mentioned). Not enough athletes train with speed, choosing to struggle slowly with weight, which is odd, as most athletic endeavors require blistering speed!

Agreed. I think 99% of athletes could do well to train some level of power/speed for pragmatic purposes.

One caveat: newer athletes commonly injure themselves trying to produce power before they have the raw force capability to do so. Basically, don’t overdo it before you’re ready!

Power= work/time
Work= force x distance
Velocity= distance/time

Therefore, power= force x velocity

Snatch’s are power exercises (lifting weights fast) velocity is the speed in which you lift the weight

I believe your comment is about determining whether powerlifting is about power or force. In my post, I mentioned that in a competition, it’s really about force. I can explain my logic.

1) Does power belong in powerlifting?
Yes! Power does help in powerlifting. As a cue, I think most people benefit from a fast concentric motion as a cue. And most lifts benefit from a dual focus on strength and speed cues.

2) Is a powerlifting competition about the person who expresses the most power?
That said… let’s think about a powerlifting competition. The primary goal of any tournament is to successfully perform the largest lift.
In a competition, using power (and consequently, speed) will help you mentally perform the lift. “Power” is a great cue to help you lift, but not the ultimate goal of the competition.
The person who explosively (powerfully) performs a 200kg deadlift loses to a person with a slightly slower (and perhaps less powerful) 210kg deadlift.

3) Wait… so as an athlete, or a powerlifter, should I train power?
Yes! Nothing happens in a vaccuum – your efforts to maximally train force will likely improve your speed (and thus, power). Efforts to train speed will likely improve your force production (and thus, maximal force). The tangential effects are just more nuanced.

I am not saying you shouldn’t focus on power development as a cue. I’m saying that – technically – a powerlifting competition would be about maximum force production, not power. Power and speed training can support your capability to develop maximum force – especially in Olympic-style lifts like a Snatch. But the winner of the competition is the person who exerts the most force.

Hahahaha kinda. If, in your house-pushing training you integrate…

1) Multiple arm angles – so pushing -45 degrees from parallel, 0 degrees from parallel, 45 degrees from parallel, etc

2) Expression of force in different ranges of motion – so pushing in straight arm, pushing in slightly bent arm, pushing in very bent arm

…and so on. The weakness of strict isometric training is that it does not fully express force through movement and angle change intramovement. It’s also a less pramatic mechanism to train if your sole goal is for “efficiency”

Lots of other benefits to isometrics though.

Force is speed based. Power is mass based. When you punch the impact is f=ma. The more speed the more force. When you explode from a down position in squats up the more speed or acceleration going up produces more forceful lifts. The faster you train your body to perform lifts during the positive phase the more muscle growth and toning aka hypertrophy. Adding more weight will make your lifts slower and less forceful but will increase maximum strength for 1 rep. Your explanations are confusing and misleading.

Glad you’re thinking this through Joseph. It’s been a while since I’ve had a chance to really hammer out the details of this.

I know that the terms used to describe the events are not intuitive – but I retort to you believing this is misleading (or erroneous). I think I’ve had a change of understanding, though not in the way you think.

Here is what I belive is unchanged:

  • – In training, you will still focus on powerful lifting. You want to train with lifting your weight with some degree of urgency.
  • – In A meet, you will still focus on powerful lifting. But, focusing on “fast” and “powerful” is a cue for your body to lift weight maximally. Your actual power output is not what’s measured for winning. What’s measured is the weight lifted above your head.
  • – There are still situations where I could see a slower concentric is desireable for training.
  • – The force equation references acceleration, not speed. Speed = distance/time*. Acceleration = Δvelocity/Δtime.
  • But, here are clarifying points of what “powerlifting” really is measuring:

  • – Powerlifting is not just about force or power – it is about lifting the maximal amount of weight. We focus on developing force and power (and in competition, but NOT training, we focus on reducing work) in order to lift weight maximally.
  • – Force is not technically the end-all. I can imagine 2 competitors in a meet. Imagine #1 is taller and exerts more force on the bench. Imagine #2 is shorter, and exerts (slightly) less force though not too significantly. If the taller person fails while the shorter person succeeds in finishing the rep (and thus, wins), #2 might have technically used less force over the entire rep.
  • – Yet, power is still not the primary determinant of success in a meet. Neither is work – since a heavier load can be lifted with less work by decreasing distance traveled. It makes more sense for the event’s name to reflect the primary criteria for success.
  • I still think powerlifting is poorly named. It’s stil based around maximal weight lifted, and confusion would be reduced if Olympic weightlifting and powerlifting swapped names.

    Hay bro, I am quite loving writings on your blog. They are made properly, easy to digest and memorize, regardless of English being my 2nd language. Cheers.

    I’m in a debate with a colleague of mine. The situation is we have two males, the first is 5’8 at 160 pounds and can max bench 315. The second is 6’1 at 160 pounds and can also max bench 315. Who is the stronger of the two males?

    It depends on how you define “strong” — as “strong” doesn’t have a singular quantifiable meaning in sports science or physics.

  • If “strength” means greater lift-to-bodyweight ratio, then the 5’8″ male wins — assuming the technique and joint integrity of both are comparable (e.g. neither has worse form/cheating/pains afterwards). This is how I normally think of physical strength as applied to linear lifts..
  • If “strength” means the ability to lift a certain amount of weight, then both are equally “strong”.
  • If “strength” means the ability to lift a certain amount of weight multiple times, then whoever can last longer is stronger.
  • If “strength” means greater force production, then the 6’1″ male (probably) wins if his arms are longer, since the angles of the arms likely means more force must be created.
  • If “strength” means greater power, then it depends on the angle/acceleration of the bar path.
  • If “strength” means overall combination of strength, endurance, durability, power, and healthy feeling, then that’s up to you.
  • I think, all things considered, I consider lift-to-bodyweight ratio a good indicator if we’re talking about being “stronger” in a single lift.
    For “overall strength”, I like to consider both maximal effort lifts alongside attributes allowing it to be expressed like:

  • How healthy is each’s joints? Do they writhe in pain at various little points in their ROM? If so, I don’t consider that strong.
  • Do they need drastic warm-up before either can express strength – or do they need a 10min warmup period? How “action ready” is that strength when needed?
  • What quality are the other non-muscular tissues?
  • Can they strike hard, like a fighter?
  • Can they really grind out through lactic acid pain like a wrestler?
  • Can they integrate their maximal lifts into athletic movements?
  • How expansive is their range-of-motion across multiple movements?
  • How durable are they (e.g. if one’s got a big bench but can’t do a 10lb forward raise….)?
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published.